Is it Costed or Had Cost?

When employing the proper verb tenses, the English language might be a little challenging at times. Many people frequently misunderstand whether the past tense of “cost” is “costed” or “had cost.” Which one is correct, then?

Simply expressed, “costed” and “had cost” are both acceptable words, but they have distinct meanings depending on the situation. The word “costed” is used to describe the price of something in the past because it is the past tense of the verb “cost.” For instance, “I spent a fortune on the new car.” While ‘had cost’ refers to the expense of something that happened before another past occurrence, ‘cost’ is the past perfect tense of the verb ‘had’. A good example might be, “By the time I bought the car, it had already cost me a fortune.”

Therefore, “costed” is the past tense of “cost,” albeit it is not frequently used in spoken language. It is frequently employed in technical or financial contexts when it is necessary to estimate or compute the cost of an item. “The project cost $10 million,” as an example.

Taking this into account, it should be noted that “costage” is also not a word in English. The proper noun is “costing,” which is the present tense of the verb “cost.” It’s used to explain how something’s cost is estimated or determined. For instance, “I am costing the project right now.” The verb “fought” is the past tense of the verb “fought.” For instance, “The soldiers bravely fought in the battle.”

In order to effectively convey the intended meaning in English, it is crucial to use the proper verb tenses. Although both “costed” and “had cost” are appropriate, they are used in distinct situations. ‘Hurted’ and ‘costage’ aren’t words in the English language. Fighting is the past tense of the verb “fight.”